![]() ![]() The formula was developed by a working group established by President Joe Biden’s 2021 climate executive order and has become a political flashpoint for conservatives critical of the administration’s efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. “Jurisdictionally, it’s a weak case,” Jonathan Adler, founding director of the environmental law center at Case Western Reserve University, said of Missouri’s effort to overturn the White House climate metric. While the justices have in recent years shown increased interest in conservative-backed environmental challenges, they turned away an earlier emergency request from Louisiana to stop the Biden administration from using the social cost metric. The Supreme Court grants only a tiny fraction of cases that come its way. Biden are “counting on the conservative majority’s well-demonstrated antipathy toward environmental regulation and its willingness to reach out and decide cases that don’t need to be decided.” He said he suspects the states involved in Missouri v. Missouri’s Supreme Court petition “is another example of red states trying to turn an ideological disagreement into a litigable issue,” Percival said. Texas appears “problematic” for Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and other Republican state officials seeking to quash the Biden team’s interim climate metric. ![]() ![]() Robert Percival, director of the environmental law program at the University of Maryland, said the court’s decision in United States v. EPA, which said states enjoy special legal standing to protect their interests. Texas, cast doubt on the court’s landmark 2007 environmental ruling, Massachusetts v. The immigration decision, United States v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |